Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Mazar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 21:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Mazar[edit]

A writer with no apparent notability from what I have found when I looked. The entire article is original research. kelapstick (talk) 01:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lacks sourcing and no assertation to notability. Pyrrhus16 15:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- Far too much of the alleged notability appears to be inherited. He may be a significant figure, but I would like to something more about his religious background, his ancestors being Jewish, not Christian. The periodicials with whcih he is associated do not have articles. I fear that he is NN, but I am not yet saying delete, as I would hope that some one can establish notability during the AFD period. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Searches turn up practially nothing notable on Mazar. No sources on his writings, his university positions, or political importance... the very things that are supposed to be giving this person notability. The closest I found is two Amazon books where Mazar is mentioned briefly within the book: http://www.amazon.com/phrase/Daniel-Mazar/ref=cap_bod_5 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sleepy2222 (talk • contribs) 05:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Barely an assertion of Notability, far less any evidence for Notability. Sources ... what sources? Delete. Springnuts (talk) 15:36, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.