Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Marshall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:34, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Marshall[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable development league coach. AHL coaches can be notable if they've coached over 200 games, per WP:NHOCKEY. An AHL season is 80 games, which is how many Marshall coached. His career outside that appears to be as a talent scout and trainer. I've found no independent coverage aside from announcements of his coaching position. Skeletor3000 (talk) 19:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 19:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 19:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 19:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Ooof. This sub-sub-stub is almost in speedy range, and given that this guy never did anything else save for some minor front office jobs and playing Division III college hockey, it's about as NN as it gets. Ravenswing 02:28, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete development league coaches are almost always non-notable for such.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:45, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, notability not established. I suspect he's done more than what's mentioned in the article today, but without more information this article should go. PK T(alk) 14:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.