Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Marcus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Though I'm completely disregarding the second delete !vote, this is a poorly sourced BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Marcus[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was deprodded by article creator without making any change sto address the concern that it appears to fail WP:FILMMAKER. I have attempted to locate any evidence that Dan Marcus is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors, that he is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique, that he has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. I could not locate enough evidence to pass WP:GNG either. It appears this may be too early to have an article. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 00:02, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I can't find any evidence that any of this filmmaker's films have received noticeable distribution yet. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:01, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I personally know Dan Marcus and refute his credentials. 07:33, 25 July 2011 (CST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.80.33.130 (talk) — 216.80.33.130 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.