Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Garrett (actor)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 14:41, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dan Garrett (actor)[edit]
- Dan Garrett (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Vanity article, lack of any references probably due to lack of notability. CSD has been removed without explanation. triwbe (talk) 15:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —triwbe (talk) 15:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Some changes to this AfD by Triwbe (talk · contribs) at 15:38, 29 July 2008 appear to have been lost. The version with that timestamp is blank. --Eastmain (talk) 17:51, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. --Eastmain (talk) 17:51, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I removed the CSD because I had added a link to the IMDb page for this actor. I think the credits are enough to prove notability. The article may have originally been Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, but I think it is relatively neutral. --Eastmain (talk) 17:51, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Imdb shows minor parts listed in a very unrelaible source. --triwbe (talk) 17:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Vanity article for actor whose major roles have been bit parts in TV series. Remember the notability guideline: "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions." This actor clearly fails this! --Slashme (talk) 07:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article falls short of our notability guidelines for actors. And I think we can do without the "vanity article" name-calling. Hasn't anyone heard of WP:AGF or WP:BITE? Ford MF (talk) 19:08, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. minor nonnotable actor. Mukadderat (talk) 15:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.