Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Eady

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:12, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Eady[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A user, User:Daneady, who appears to be the subject, has requested deletion of the page in an edit summary. As stated at WP:BLP: "If a dispute centers around a page's inclusion (e.g., because of questionable notability or where the subject has requested deletion), this is addressed via deletion discussions rather than by summary deletion." If needed, the Subjects Contact Us form could probably be requested of the user to verify his identity. The content was replaced and the user provided a link to IMDb, which isn't considered a reliable source.

Also, the article to begin with was not very well sourced; it did not use any inline citations, and all of its references were either inaccessible or of questionable reliability. See the page history for these links. This in itself is in violation of WP:BLP. After a Google search, I could not find any reliable sources about the subject. – T C Memoire 04:11, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. – T C Memoire 04:11, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. – T C Memoire 04:11, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - regardless of whether the requester is the subject, the subject is not notable.Flat Out let's discuss it 05:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:54, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - seems like a fairly straightforward case even without the subject's request, which only adds extra weight. Frickeg (talk) 01:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a few parts in various short films, a stint as a writer in a large newpaper but no coverage about him. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:09, 18 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.