Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Bilzerian (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 15:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Bilzerian (song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. Redirect reverted without comment. SummerPhD^v2.0 02:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The really should be a redirect to the parent album, but that has been delayed for at least three years now. In the meantime, two paragraphs on Pitchfork and three on Complex are about all that's available in WP:RS, and even those are really little more than "here's a new song" with links to YouTube and SoundCloud. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:14, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.