Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Bewick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails WP:PROMOTIONAL and WP:GNG -- RoySmith (talk) 12:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Dan Bewick

Dan Bewick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unashamed promotional article by someone whose only activity other than being the creator and major contributor to this article revolves around excessive promotion of another band. Riddled with issues. GNG and WP:Music being the primary ones for this nomination. Also effectively unreferenced - discogs and imdb profiles only. Excessive discography list with no references and no indication of his role in them. Click through all the aliases, variations and incarnations on the discogs profile page and there's no suggestion that we're getting anywhere near notability.

Main discogs page Discogs for Dirty Rotten Scoundrels - the article implies that DRS are a notable group such that membership of conveys notability. this link suggests otherwise. another profile of an alias (these are not cherry-picked to support the nom)
and another. subject has numerous aliases but all very low level releases, maybe a remix on a very non-notable track, one appearance on a random compilation album. seems to be a trend across the few aliases used by subject. overall it seems like the sum total falls short of notability - general or music.
Rather than tidying it and then nominating it, i'm leaving it in its original form. Commenters can then see the list of awards (unreferenced) which are seemingly insignificant awards with regards to notability (no article and nothing on google). Rayman60 (talk) 08:13, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:50, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:50, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

• Delete a non-notable music producer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:48, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 13:46, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

• Delete - can find very little on this producer. Certainly not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:45, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.