Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Adler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 12:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Adler[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Adler's main claim to notability is being a failed candidate for US congress, which is just not enough. He has served on a bunch of boards etc., but none of them seem to be really notable, nor do his activitises in the entertainment industry add up to notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:01, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - his various controversies and jobs in Hollywood might be sufficient for notability. Bearian (talk) 00:25, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Mostly WP:Trivial mentions. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 05:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with Ramaksoud2000, only trivial mentions. Fails WP:ONESENTENCE...Rameshnta909 (talk) 19:04, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.