Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan "Two Dogs" Hampton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 00:26, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dan "Two Dogs" Hampton[edit]

Dan "Two Dogs" Hampton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article borders on an advertisement. He fails WP:SOLDIER and I believe he also fails WP:AUTHOR. The Time article is a vanity interview after the release of his book. Not exactly a RS Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now. This article is obviously a stub in progress by a new editor. We should help new editors out, not rush to delete. I've already made a few fixes. TeriEmbrey (talk) 14:31, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 15:20, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Plenty of references in reliable sources available online, in addition to the ones already listed. Examples here and here and here: ABF99 (talk) 02:10, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:16, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ABF99, Thanks for your help in linking a couple of articles that could be used for further discussion on this page. I'm a new editor, so I am still getting used to formatting and structuring through Wikipedia. Appreciate your help!Ethanze (talk) 17:42, 15 October 2015 (UTC)--Ethanze (talk) 17:42, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Seems to have participated in enough important events. Books help put him over the line. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.