Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damian Ciancio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 22:49, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Damian Ciancio[edit]
- Damian Ciancio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable person. The only sources on page are Wikipedia and YouTube. Google search shows no significant results. I really think this should be speedy deleted. JDDJS (talk) 22:43, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete besides, it was created by Damianciancio, so there might be a conflict of interest Cambalachero (talk) 22:58, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lacks reliable sources needed to show notability. Gnews has never heard of this guy; Gbooks has copies of this article. Edward321 (talk) 00:13, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete only references are WP and YouTube. Unable to locate verifiable sources to establish notability. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 02:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — makes his animation some of the best on the market.... He has worked passionately to produce and succeed ...He is a top 2D animation director. Spam, non-notable and COI. I actually speeedied this bit of self-promotion, but was asked to reinstate Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:46, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete per lack of notable mentions. When I searched both Google and Yahoo, all I found were gaming websites and brief mentions of his name. SwisterTwister talk 05:12, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.