Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dallas Real Estate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 02:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dallas Real Estate[edit]

Originally, I pondered putting a speedy delete tag on this, but there was a lot of demographic information about the Dallas area, so I left it. Another user and I discussed it and felt that unsourced and wikify would work. But now the demographic information has been removed, leaving us with just some vague statements with nothing to substantiate them. I really don't see how this stub can be expanded without turning it into an ad. Corvus cornix 20:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per WP:VERIFY --Javit 20:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - DISCLOSURE: I am the editor that removed all the demographic information. All of that information already exists (and properly so) in the Dallas, Texas article. None of the deomgraphic information was being used to support information on the Dallas real estate market. The rest of the article doesn't provide any useful references per WP:V and WP:RS. -- Whpq 22:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Right. I have no objections to the removal, by the way. Corvus cornix 23:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I support deletion of the article, I orginally put a Speedy Deletion tag, but removed it after Corvus Cornix discussed it with me, we thought it would be a valid article considering the demographic info, since then it was removed, I placed the wikify and unsourced tag, but it doesn't seem like someone will be able to come in and make the article any better.--♫Twinkler4♫ 15:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Has no value on its own. If there is anything worth saying about Dallas's real estate market, it belongs in the Dallas article. Not suggesting a merge, since there is nothing worth merging. Adrian M. H. 17:34, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of references and quite frankly, this should only be mention into the Dallas or related articles on population or economics related to Dallas or the DFW region.--JForget 00:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.