Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalgarian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#A1. It's not quite "very short" but it's certainly lacking in enough context to identify its fictional milieu. Doesn't seem to be G4 as the previous deletion was speedy. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dalgarian[edit]

Not sure what this is supposed to be, no sources, no apparent notability, and Google is no help. Unfortunately I don't see any CSD criteria that this fits. I skipped prod because the author would contest it. Oren0 (talk) 02:44, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete - Snake oil.PB666 ^yap 02:57, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged Speedy A1. Written as if the subject were in real life. If it is indeed a fictional concept, the article gives no clue whatsoever about which work of fiction describes this. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 03:03, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to delete it as A1 but I'm not sure it fits the criterion. I'll let another admin judge. Oren0 (talk) 03:08, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete endorced. Un-encyclopedic nonsence.--Pmedema (talk) 03:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (speedy or otherwise) A1, indeed. Ecoleetage (talk) 03:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as G4: recreation of deleted material. It was deleted before as G1, and I assume everyone must have meant this, since A1 is for lack of context (this article has enough context to let me know its a hoax). — _Maggot^Syn 04:25, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: tagged as G4. One more time and I'm filing a salt. — _Maggot^Syn 04:29, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - G4 doesn't apply either ("This does not apply to content that has been undeleted via deletion review, deleted via proposed deletion, or to speedy deletions"). Oren0 (talk) 04:31, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - On a technicality, the log doesn't specify that it was speedied as patent nonsense. I assumed it, since its the only one that would have fit. Either way, its speedy applicable. Change the tag back for me then. — _Maggot^Syn 04:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.