Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalet School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 01:11, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Dalet School

Dalet School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

no reliable sources in article or findable by me to establish notability. There also appear to be conflict of interest issues for the article's creators. I have also just nominated the Obadiah school, which is apparently colocated with this one. Bali ultimate (talk) 15:25, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:45, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - The school is actual the headquarters of the Assemblies of Yahweh as shown here [1]. That in and of its self establishes notability. I referenced and cited the piece as such. Likewise most secondary educational institutes are usually considered notable by a majority of consensus. Thanks. ShoesssS ^Talk 15:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
• Comment In that the Dalet School has a program that includes education for grades 9 through 12, it might qualify under our rules for high schools. Weak keep, however, because it doesn't appear that the entire K-12 program has that many students. If nothing else, merge to Assemblies of Yahweh, which operates the school. Mandsford (talk) 16:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - includes a high school and sources to meet WP:ORG are available. TerriersFan (talk) 16:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - per edits by ShoesssS. Passes WP:N --Sting Buzz Me... 00:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - Only Ricky and Bali have been having a go against all the AOY articles. Dalet School may be a private school, but it one of few schools that promote the keeping of the biblical law. Also, corresponds to the Assemblies of Yahweh. I would also suggest reversing all the edits done by Ricky and Bali to the article/s, as it seems to have caused a lot of discontent. In Citer (talk) 16:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC)— In Citer (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Comment - I personally find the tag placed on In Citer signature as not only trying to poison the well but offense. I would ask that you remove it. Thanks ShoesssS ^Talk 17:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
• Comment Citer, is that attack against me necessary? I haven't even make a comment in this AFD and I wish you would assume good faith as to my edits in this article. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:55, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.