Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dakota Daulby
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 02:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dakota Daulby[edit]
- Dakota Daulby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An actor who is just starting out. Has done shorts except for the movie, The Woodcarver. The movie was a small production that appears to have been directed toward the Christian market. Only one independent and reliable source. This is a case of WP:TOOSOON. Prod was contested for unknown reasons. Bgwhite (talk) 18:06, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bgwhite (talk) 18:07, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for now... and perhaps return to its author as WP:Userspace draft. Un-named roles in a number of shorts does not meet the criteria set by WP:ENT. Lack of any sort of coverage[1] in reliable sources fails WP:GNG. While this fellow might one day have Wikipedia notability, he does not at this time. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:16, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 12:24, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Bmusician 01:32, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ‣ In the absence of Google News or Google Books hits or other significant coverage in reliable sources. WP:USUAL. --▸∮truthious ᛔandersnatch◂ 16:49, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.