Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daisy Rock (actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 11:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy Rock (actress)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and PORNBIO. Deprodded by the usual suspect without any improvement. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, No evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 08:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as none of this better satisfies the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the logic of my original PROD: No qualifying awards, only nonscene award is NN and therefore cannot meet PORNBIO standards. No independent reliable sourcing. No reliably sourced biographical content. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 13:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.