Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daisy Coleman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. Resolved to change redirect. (non-admin closure) {MordeKyle} ☢ 23:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy Coleman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The title of the page is the name of a 14 year old victim of a sex crime. This should not be indexed, redirected, or anything else per WP:N, specifically WP:VICTIM and WP:BLPNAME as well as WP:BLP1E. Not to mention, this is in incredibly poor taste. {MordeKyle} ☢ 01:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This page was redirecting to Maryville, Missouri#2012 sexual assault incident where the name of this 14 year old sex crime victim was being reported. I removed the name per the above policies. {MordeKyle} ☢ 02:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Keep per WP:CHEAP, WP:CENSOR and WP:WRONGFORUM. This is a legitimate search term for an encyclopedia article, even if the name is not in the article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is not censorship. This is not about this person's name not being in the article itself. This person is the victim of this crime. The underage victim of this crime. {MordeKyle} ☢ 20:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The name has been published in multiple reliable sources, there is no reason at WP:R#DELETE to delete the redirect and the names of the two 17 year old males are still in the article. Additionally, since this term has never been an article, this term does not belong at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking about the names of the two males that were convicted of the crimes? Of course their names are in the article. See WP:BLPCRIME for why their names can be in the article. Again, this goes back to the policies listed above, which are mostly part of WP:BLP, which takes precedence. All policy aside, this person was the victim of this crime. You really think that listing this person as a searchable term to the crime in which she was sexually assaulted at the age of 14 is ok? This is absurd. {MordeKyle} ☢ 22:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - AFAIK, one 17 year old male was sentenced, one was not. See Audrie & Daisy. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jax 0677:I was not aware this page existed. This is where all of these articles should be redirected to. That documentary is going to be where their notability is inherited. I will happily close this AfD if we redirect these to that page instead. {MordeKyle} ☢ 22:27, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you are correct about the second individual. According to the LA Times:

A friend of Barnett's, Jordan Zech, was not charged. He had been accused of making a cellphone video of the incident, but one was never found

This person will need to be removed from the article, and I will do so. {MordeKyle} ☢ 22:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I will concur with redirecting Paige Parkhurst and Daisy Coleman to Audrie & Daisy. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will take care of it. {MordeKyle} ☢ 23:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.