Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dahlia Sky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dahlia Sky[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG as no significant coverage in independent reliable secondary sources, does not meet WP:PORNBIO as no awards, no genre contributions. Cowlibob (talk) 20:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. SwisterTwister talk 05:11, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:02, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:02, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unfortunately looks don't count towards notability ... Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 01:04, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:PORNBIO and WP:GNG, all sources in the article are in-trade, web searches turn up porn outlets and social media Kraxler (talk) 13:47, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.