Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dahlia's Tear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:25, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dahlia's Tear[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musical project. Talk page shows that at some point it was up for speedy deletion, but somehow that process was stopped, even though the discussion shows that no hint of notability has been given. Multiple wikipedias have the exact same poorly referenced article with next to no information at all. In the meantime, even the project's website seems to have disappeared. - Andrei (talk) 08:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unsourced --or at least dead/expired links when given except for the band's myspace page. article author is a 1-subject (this band) writer, indicating possible autobiography or COI at work. no readily-apparent notability.Cramyourspam (talk) 15:11, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find any third party sources that would justify the article's notability. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 21:28, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.