Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daequan (streamer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:54, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Daequan (streamer)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I'm concerned, there isn't any significant coverage on this streamer. Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 06:04, 18 October 2018 (UTC); edited 06:08, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 October 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:21, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:42, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:42, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:42, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability. 2.5mil subscribers still doesn't make one notability inherently. Ajf773 (talk) 23:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 16:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If this article had more information, I would be open to keeping it, but because it doesn't I'm for deleting it. Hamtime6531 (talk) Edited 18:42, 28 October 2018 (CST)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.