Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Da Volunteers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Da Volunteers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a claim of notability, but no evidence thereof. LadyofShalott 16:32, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —LadyofShalott 16:35, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Little more than WP:SPAM and WP:AUTO for some guys who fail WP:MUSIC. Qworty (talk) 19:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - insufficient coverage to establish notability. None fot eh album sales out theri trunk is verifiable. Coverage in media is almost nonexistent. There is this local story. But there's not enough to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 15:02, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Stories in local media don't satisfy WP:N. Although they have downloads available online (e.g. at CDbaby.com]) their label is also non-noteworthy. Ivanvector (talk) 21:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.