Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Da Bomb Bikes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:23, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Da Bomb Bikes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no coverage. This company fails WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 00:58, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm sure they make nice bikes, but that is not an inclusion criteria here. Couldn't find much of anything by way of significant coverage, though mountain biking magazines and Mandarin language sites may have more. Happy to consider anything anyone else can find but at the moment, I can't support keeping this. Stalwart111 01:41, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article is unreferenced, and a search revealed only user-editable reviews, no RS coverage to establish notability. Dialectric (talk) 02:29, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, an article on a Mom & Pop company won't make it. NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 02:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:CORPDEPTH for a Wikipedia article; source searches are not providing significant coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:29, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.