Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYTA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 19:56, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYTA[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deleted through prod last fall. Nothing but listings, with no indepth coverage, does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BCAST. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree clear fail of WP:GNG Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Article seems to have more sources unlike before. Sources 1 to 3 state that the station is licensed by the NTC as it indicates an operator having a station. Same goes for source 4. Source 5 mentions the program director of the station. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:BCAST. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Superastig.--Tdl1060 (talk) 23:58, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - neither being licensed by the NTC nor having a program director are elements of WP:BCAST. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Being licensed is an element of WP:BCAST, as unlicensed stations have a higher bar to clear, and having a reliable source mention the station's program director supports the assertion that the station is the "originator of some programming", which is an element of WP:BCAST.--Tdl1060 (talk) 01:12, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tdl1060, sorry, no it's not. While unlicensed stations cannot meet BCAST, having a license does not satisfy BCAST. And you are making an assumption when you say that having a director of programming supports the assertion that the "station is the "originator of some programming". It simply says that the station has programming, without giving any indication as to whether or not that programming is original, which is an aspect of BCAST. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:46, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:BCAST per Astig's argument. SBKSPP (talk) 01:47, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.