Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DX Studio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) asilvering (talk) 03:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DX Studio[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find significant coverage for this game engine. The only sources I can find are press releases from Gameindustry.biz, which aren't remotely enough to demonstrate notability. OceanHok (talk) 15:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Technology. OceanHok (talk) 15:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on reviews already in the article. [1] [2] ~ A412 ^talk! 19:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MCV TOOL FOCUS: DX Studio v3.0
gamedeveloper.com Worldweaver Releases DX Studio 2.3
AdWeek Create as many words as you can each day in WordBog on Facebook

IgelRM (talk) 23:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to say, above comment constitutes Keep. IgelRM (talk) 08:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.