Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWGA-TV

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 07:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DWGA-TV[edit]

DWGA-TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Television station lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Perhaps a redirect to GMA Network might be an WP:ATD? MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:37, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment These should be merged into one mass AfD. You can't expect people to reasearch and comment on every single one, but the resulting lack of attention will skew the results towards deletion regardless of merits. small jars tc 09:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello small jars. The references for each station need to be evaluated, regardless of whether the nominations are separate or combined. It is possible that the situation will differ for some of the articles, so merging all of the nominations together could muddy the waters. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 12:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    It might be true that each article would be examined individually in an ideal world, but please consider merging if the majority of them haven't been commented on (excluding parrots) after a week. small jars tc 15:34, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 02:55, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The notability of this TV station appears to be supported by other references on Wikipedia, from non-english language sources. (See: Tagalog entry for GMA network) Jack4576 (talk) 06:23, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:57, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.