Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWAI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to DZRR. And protect Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:42, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DWAI[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic does not meet the notability criteria for WP:GNG and WP:ORG. No significant coverage in reliable sources. I merged the content to ABS-CBN (see diff [1]). But an editor reverted it (see diff [2]). It doesn't seem to fit anywhere else. Steve Quinn (talk) 04:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 09:25, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 09:25, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - TheMagnificentist 09:26, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - TheMagnificentist 12:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salted redirect to DZRR It's a translator for another station; we generally don't keep those. Nothing else for this to stand on as it produces no local programming. DZRR could probably be d/s/r'ed to My Only Radio itself as its only original product is local news and a countdown show. Nate • (chatter) 05:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect with SALT per Nate. Per WP:NMEDIA, radio "stations" which exist as relay transmitters of another station, and not as standalone originators of at least some of their own programming, get redirects to their parent service and not separate articles as standalone topics. Bearcat (talk) 19:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.