Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DVLA Number Plates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Gone StarM 12:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DVLA Number Plates[edit]

I believe that this article exists partly to promote a website. The article does not provide much context for what it is attempting to describe. It also appears to function partly as a guide. Richard Cavell (talk) 11:23, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - Spam is great in a Korean barbecue, nasty in Wikipedia. Thanks! --Cerejota (talk) 11:28, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It certainly isn't G11, but this article exists as an information "pamphlet" to advise of some changes within the DVLA. Fails WP:NOTGUIDE. PeterSymonds (talk) 11:46, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Even if this was put in context, etc., it's still in the category of a how-to. --Lockley (talk) 15:45, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per lack of verifiability and that this is not a hot-to guide. MuZemike (talk) 17:50, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - looks like a copyvio from ezinearticles.com/?Personal-Number-Plate-Retention-Scheme---Important-Changes-Coming&id=1689354 (not linked because site is spam blacklisted) to me. JulesH (talk) 00:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - advertising/how-to guide, both of which are unsuitable for an article. In fact, I can't actually tell what this article is trying to say. gm_matthew (talk) 22:44, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.