Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DS Game Maker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 10:28, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DS Game Maker[edit]

(Find video game sources: "DS Game Maker" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Non-notable game engine. None of the very few Google hits are reliable sources, and the article only lists primary sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Utterly WP:NN product targeted at game-maker wannabees. A great example of why Wikipedia needs a speedy deletion criterion for articles about products that do not assert the product's notability. Toddst1 (talk) 06:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Did not meet WP:GNG notability standards. Found one book on the topic, listed below, but no other media coverage among reliable sources. This is an informative blog post, but blogs aren't considered reliable.

NDS Game Creation Using DS Game Maker - Practical Tips and Techniques. HobbyPRESS. 28 August 2010. ISBN 978-1-4537-2225-1.

––Agyle (talk) 23:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not passing WP:GNG with multiple reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. I can hardly see any material on the engine, mostly primary and discussions. The book appears to be a tutorial solely, but even if it was a GNG-worthy source, it's still just one. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 22:37, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.