Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNALinux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. jj137 ^♠ 17:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DNALinux[edit]

NN Linux distro. Or is it? Prod removed and listing here as a result Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google turns up about 67K results, from what seems to be reliable sources. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 13:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I hadn't heard of it before this AFD, but there seems to be plenty of sources. There are so many distros of Linux, it would be too subjective (OR/POV) to limit distros that has this much coverage. Pharmboy (talk) 13:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as this is a legitimate distro with actual history. And, I seem to recall it being fairly notable at its height of popularity. Certainly, the article's a stub. But there's sufficient information available that a very good article may emerge. As it seems that DNALinux has somewhat "died", perhaps one of the Linux "historians" may stumble across the article and give it some much-needed love. -- Lewellyn ^talk 14:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's short alright... no need to delete it though. Ohmpandya (Talk) 18:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —Rigadoun (talk) 16:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Never heard of it before, but it seems notable enough. Lawrence Cohen 23:09, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.