Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DLow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK#1, nomination withdrawn and no outstanding delete !votes. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor ^Talk! 04:16, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DLow[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Almost CSD'ed it, but it has one link. At this time, everything else looks like social media. WP:TOOSOON.~~ Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - looks too small to me. Hardly any info at all. Still is not adequate enough BLP or BDP for an article. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:27, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 09:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Americas-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 09:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 09:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it is linked from Bet You Can't Do It Like Me, which has charted on the Billboard Hot 100. He has coverage in the Chicago Reader [1], and his "DLow Shuffle" got him attention previously and earned him an appearance on the Steve Harvey show so he's not just in social media. I know it's pretty bare now but there is enough for a decent article. TaylorMoore2 (talk) 18:08, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete per above deletions as the article doesn't contain any information. Also if it links to an article it doesn't mean anything without sources and information.~~ Adog104 ^{Talk to me} 22:23, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per the fixes that were made to better improve the article. Adog104 ^{Talk to me} 02:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis Brown, Qwertyxp2000, Adog104, I've made improvements, please reevaluate the article and possibly change your votes. TaylorMoore2 (talk) 02:44, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - okay, now I am not on any side at the moment. For me now, I am now half-and-half~~, though~~ because the article may still have some repetition issues. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 03:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From those "DLOW" then "DLOW" repeating words coming around as I read the article. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 03:14, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Can't withdraw this late with mixed votes, but I struck my nomination. It is still weak with some of the youtube type links, but the Chig. Tribute article is solid, the blog is a bit weak but the Chicago Sun owns it and I assume has a little bit of editorial control over it, plus he did get on Steve Harvey's show, so in the end, I think the fixes bring it just past the bar, thus keep. Good job. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 03:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.