Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Tarkan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 03:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Tarkan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly obvious case of no better notability and improvement and my searches found nothing better than this so unless better sources are found, I'm not seeing much here and this hasn't changed much since starting in August 2010. Pinging Hasteur. SwisterTwister talk 07:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~delete - non-notable. DangerDogWest (talk) 07:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)~~[reply]

Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - If these maintenance templates haven't been fixed in over 4 years, that's a indication that there's a lack of notability/interest in this page. This is effectively a vanity-bio and not seeing any real compelling arguments for keeping this. No objection to Userfication/Draftspacing to allow the author/advocate to improve the content. Hasteur (talk) 13:03, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I removed a large part of this article as a WP:COPYVIO of the subject's own site. The other two references are inaccessible for verification, but I don't see the claims in the article as establishing encyclopaedic notability (and note also DJ Magazine#Top 100 Controversies), and am seeing nothing better. AllyD (talk) 08:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not seeing enough in-depth coverage from reliable sources to meet notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:14, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.