Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Dominic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Favonian (talk) 14:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Dominic[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources cover DJ Dominic in significant. ~ Dictionary (chat) 01:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those information are not added yet at times goes by it will be added MICHAEL PEWEE (talk) 01:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete A7, G5 and G11: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Flex Liberia, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ D. Pewee, etc. Also utterly non-notable per WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. Wikishovel (talk) 01:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Recreation of a page deleted at least 3 times by a WP:SPA that is likely a sockpuppet of the banned user:Flex Liberia due to a similar name and recreating this page. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 01:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Liberia, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Under A7, A11, G5, and G11, all of which are valid. Why two admins declined it under faulty reasoning, I'll never know. Why? I Ask (talk) 05:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion criteria are intentionally limited and specific, particularly A7. One admin declined to delete and I supported them when the same exact tags were reapplied to the article. If the page creator is identified as a confirmed sockpuppet, then CSD G5 would apply. This AFD looks like it will result in deletion, I don't see this situation as urgent. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot seriously tell me with a straight face that this article isn't straight up spam by a user whose name is the same as a sock whose accounts have been blocked over fifty times. I respect you and all you do to ensure CSD is not carried out willy-nilly... but c'mon. Why? I Ask (talk) 06:14, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy/snow delete. I mean, come on. Clear WP:DUCK socking, the sources are AI garbage, the article is word salad. An embarrassment to Wikipedia. Jfire (talk) 05:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW - has zero chance of surviving AfD and is blatant block evasion in any case. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all the above. Not notable in any form. Lynch44 (talk) 14:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.