Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Buddy Holly (David Charles Kramer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Kudpung per CSD G4 and salted. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Buddy Holly (David Charles Kramer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability standards as subject lacks significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Gnews and Gbook searches turned up only a few references, all of which were self-created or found in unreliable sources. The one scholarly article cited includes only a passing mention. There just isn't enough around to establish notability. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 22:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No reliable sources to be found that support notability. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 23:05, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above. Lack of adequate, independent sourcing. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:08, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Lack of (reliable) source, context, and content excluding "References".--FrankBoy _(Buzz) 23:09, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. This might even be speedyable. This article has been deleted in various different formats. I've salted the other two versions of this, which is why this is coming up under this particular rendition. It's been deleted as Buddy Holly (disk jockey) and Dj buddy holly, plus there was an attempt to redirect his DJ name to the Buddy Holly article with DJ Buddy Holly. This needs to stop. I've tagged the user's userpage as a promotional article and as a way to try to get around the deletions in the mainspace. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 23:44, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I should probably also launch an SPI to see if any of the editors for the other pages are socks of the current editor trying to add the page, as it's very suspicious that this account suddenly launched and tried to create an article after the previous attempts were deleted. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 23:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This looks to be a sock of User:Djdevious, who created several socks years ago. It also looks like this article was also earlier created at David Charles Kramer and DJ Devious. Yeah... some salting and banning needs to occur here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 23:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opened an SPI here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 23:59, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.