Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DBR Records(Stephen Milano)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete – filelakeshoe (t / c) 09:11, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DBR Records(Stephen Milano)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This label seams to lack WP:Notability (WP:NORG). Google search return just 10 hits [1]. No reliable sources to prove Notability. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:10, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable. This press release does not merit conversion to a proper article. Offers no sourcing other than firm's own website. Essentially zero RS coverage, let alone anything substantial. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

– filelakeshoe (t / c) 09:11, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]