Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D2 (clothing)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
D2 (clothing)[edit]
- D2 (clothing) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I believe the company fails notability - it is a retail company with a website, and I cannot find anything that could be added to the article without it turning into an advert. Putney Bridge (talk) 00:21, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom. Hubschrauber729 (talk) 00:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The company appears to have gained a reasonable amount of news coverage, notably this article and this article providing significant coverage of the subject, which just about justifies inclusion. – Toon(talk) 02:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep A Google search reveals almost nothing and so I was inclined to a delete until I read the two articles kindly found by Toon they seem to confer some notability especially in Scotland. Paste (talk) 14:11, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 04:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- news sources do cover the company so notability is established. -- Whpq (talk) 18:04, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.