Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D.light, Inc. (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 17:13, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

D.light, Inc.[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In 2016, IagoQnsi AfD'd this article with the rationale This article makes no credible claim of significance and has no indication that its subject is notable. The article includes a lot of information about how big the off-grid solar industry is (1.2 billion people as target customers, 100 companies in industry), but makes no mention of why d.light might be considered a notable player within that industry.

The only noteworthy coverage that d.light seems to have received is the NYTimes article, which is not enough to indicate notability in the absence of other reliable sources.

The AfD did not gain any input but I find the argument compelling. SITH (talk) 12:33, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:42, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:42, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:43, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:43, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:43, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the reasons I gave in 2016. –IagoQnsi (talk) 12:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.