Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D'ni Patriots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 00:57, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

D'ni Patriots[edit]

About a non-notable Yahoo group, written pretending that the world of the Myst computer games is real. Prod'ed before with the reason "Based on the submitter Cha'Rehls's contributions, I expect he is watching how long we let this article exist." but tag was removed. Kusma (討論) 02:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nominator. Kusma (討論) 02:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, by the way Kusma, because you were the one who nominated the article, its already assumed that you want it to be deleted so it isn't necessary for you to vote --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 13:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable, Yahoogroupcruft. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:36, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not a publisher of creative thought. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 02:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRUFT and WP:NOT per the above. Royboy crashfan 02:55, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --OneEuropeanHeart 04:11, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, and per WP:NOT, Yahoogroupcruft. --Ter e nc e Ong 09:27, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, as non-notable --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 13:16, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, It is a little fuzzy as to what is creative thought and non-notable on the part of a ametuer and what is accepted fiction on the part of a professional. I have seen countless articles on fictional characters that are not deleted, while this character, being invented (presumably) by the author or a close friend, is not accepted due to its lack of fame. Of course, I am not sure of all of Wikipedia's guidlines on the subject, although it appears as though they are just made up by the users anyway. It looks to me as though this guy is trying to create a famous character from scratch, which is kind of interesting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.218.108.5 (talk • contribs)

Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 17:15, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --AaronS 18:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Eivind 02:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That last comment was correct. It would be kind of hypocritical for this article to be deleted merely on the basis that the subject matter is not well known. It's not as though Wikipedia has a lack of memory to keep this article as one of it's over 1,000,000. I think it is pretty interesting myself.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.