Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D'Artagnan Collier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 04:27, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

D'Artagnan Collier[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An exceedingly minor candidate for Mayor of Detroit from an exceedingly minor political party. Sesel (talk) 00:51, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems to go against both WP:SOURCES as most of what I see are articles written by this person and the most obvious is violation of WP:POLITICIAN Maybe if they win! TomKoenig (talk) 01:44, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Detroit mayoral election, 2013. He is on the ballot. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:01, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Was on the ballot; today's election is only between two candidates, and this one polled under 100, only a tenth of a percent in the primary. Nate • (chatter) 12:15, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Was on the ballot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aibara (talk • contribs) 16:56, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Being on the ballot does not satisfy WP:NPOL, it's quite clear about that.TomKoenig (talk) 03:34, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete In addition to the minor candidate status being in direct conflict with WP:BIO, the article itself is written more as a campaign piece than an informative entry. To restructure it in a neutral fashion that conforms to WP:NPOV would require a rewrite not warranted by the lack of Notability.Endeavor51 (talk) 20:29, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.