Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cytosorbents

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:50, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cytosorbents[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion. Not a single reliable source referencing 'Cytosorbents.' The only reliable source, the New England Journal of Medicine is a reference to products not sold by Cytosorbents. EzPz (talk) 18:23, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing both WP:NCORP and the WP:GNG. Although there were plenty of press releases to review, significant independent coverage wasn't found. Also considered refocusing the article on their flagship product CytoSorb and significant coverage to support that wasn't found either. (I see the AFD is listed with the CSD G11 criterion, which isn't directly applicable to an AFD discussion, but I didn't find the article in its current status overwhelmingly promotional enough to qualify for CSD G11. If I thought it did I would have short-circuited the AFD by tagging it with that CSD instead.) Zad68 01:48, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORP. My search results were the same as Zad's: just press releases and a few routine business listings. --MelanieN (talk) 17:41, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.