Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyprus–Malaysia relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 08:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cyprus–Malaysia relations[edit]

another random combination. non resident embassies. Google news search doesn't reveal much. all I could find is one mention of Malaysia on the Cyprus/Turkey issue. [1] LibStar (talk) 13:50, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, simply being members of the Commonwealth of Nations doesn't make the relationship notable. Nyttend (talk) 15:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - typically random pairing failing to establish notability; membership in the Commonwealth is documented at Commonwealth of Nations. - Biruitorul ^Talk 15:19, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, not likely to be found so. This article borders on being a mere dictionary entry. --BlueSquadronRaven 16:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included on the and Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations/Bilateral relations task force/Deletion page(s), which are related to this deletion discussion. User:Ikip
Strong keep member of the commonwealth of nation. Much more can be added to this article. Ikip (talk) 02:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, no: see List of members of the Commonwealth of Nations. If that's all we have, that's not proof of notability. - Biruitorul ^Talk 02:35, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with above, where's the significant third party coverage to prove notable bilateral relations? LibStar (talk) 02:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a bilateral relationship of so little import to the nations involved that they don't bother with embassies in each others capitals. There are no reliable sources that discuss this relationship. Delete.Bali ultimate (talk) 15:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.