Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cynthia Pinot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cynthia Pinot[edit]

Cynthia Pinot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actress fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. KidAd (talk) 22:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete of the two sources one does not work. Of course that is actually being overly optimistic. One source is IMDb that is not reliable, and the other is her not working website. It also does not appear she ever had a significant role in a notable production.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete: As an actress the subject does not meet the relevant notability requirements, but I qualify my vote as "Weak" because I provide no opinion regarding WP:NMODEL (though I suspect a similar conclusion would be drawn in that regard). Dflaw4 (talk) 18:16, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.