Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cymbiotic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 01:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Cymbiotic[edit]
- Cymbiotic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD; fails WP:BAND. They may have released albums, but so have thousands of bands. They may have had some radio play, but not enough to meet our criteria. Rodhullandemu 16:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 03:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Potentially passes WP:BAND criterion 11 (music in rotation on a national station) but in any case fails WP:N (significant coverage in reliable independent sources) as although there's a bit of buzz on blogs and forums there's nothing (that I could find) which constitutes a "reliable source". - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite 01:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.