Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyborg (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) BlacknoseDace(say something. I'm lonely!)^{[I'm not a reference!]} 16:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cyborg (video game)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only source is a review in a magazine, and there is clearly no significant coverage. BlacknoseDace(say something. I'm lonely!)^{[I'm not a reference!]} 14:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. BlacknoseDace(say something. I'm lonely!)^{[I'm not a reference!]} 14:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I found a second review: https://archive.org/details/80-U.S._Volume_VI_Number_01_1983-01_80-Northwest_Publishing_US/page/n79/mode/2up?q=cyborg and there is a note there about the Guinness Book. I will see what else can be found. BOZ (talk) 14:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be mentioned in Byte, and a longer review in Microcomputing. Haven't looked for others yet. --Izno (talk) 15:28, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP Notable achievement, as Bilby just added: It is listed by Guinness World Records as the first cyberpunk video game. And it got reviews so passes the general notability guideline. Dream Focus 15:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Enough reviews to satisfy notability. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm seeing the rationale for keep now. I'll probably withdrawal if the Keeps continue to come in at this rate. BlacknoseDace(say something. I'm lonely!)^{[I'm not a reference!]} 16:20, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Two people, at this rate? What?! You know evidence has now been found its notable, then just withdrawal. No sense dragging this out and wasting everyone's time. Dream Focus 16:24, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry if I offended you. I'll withdrawal now. BlacknoseDace(say something. I'm lonely!)^{[I'm not a reference!]} 16:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.