Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyberSEO (plugin)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:45, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CyberSEO (plugin)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. One of very many plug-ins that are available. Only a single mention in the refs and searches reveal plenty of mentions from selling and software sites, but nothing that I could see that conveyed notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable wordpress plugin.--KartikeyaS (talk) 18:54, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Excuse me. Not notable where and for whom? It's a very old project and I'm using it since 2010 or something like that. I can assure you it's a very popular plugin among the IM people (those that do Internet Marketing). You should understand that the content curation/syndication niche is not a mainstream one. It's a very narrow thing for a small % of WordPress users. However it's really popular in specific IM niches. Not even mention its popularity in the online adult industry. Why there? The answer is very simple - most of the existing content delivery solutions (e.g. usual blog feeds, news feeds, youtube video feeds, online shop product feeds etc) have were firstly adopted by the adult industry and after that they became usual for all of us. So if you don't work in the IM niche, it's really a non-notable thing for you, but not for me. For example, I heard about Tiktok, FaceBook, Tinder and VK, but they are absolutely non-notable for me. I have never had an account there and have no idea on how to use them. Should they be deleted only because I'm not familiar with them personally? By the way, this is my first and I hope last post at wikipedia... Nobody knows why Wikipedia is full of disinformation subjective opinions. I think that's because of all these "moderators" that think they know it all... VladZornin (talk) 12:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC) — VladZornin (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete Totally not a notable piece of software. Which isn't suppressing. Since the article seems to have been created and mainly edited by a SPA/COI editor. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:54, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep It's mentioned in the book which is written by an absolutely independent journalist and course it's mentioned on many WordPress-related sites in the Net. Now why it's not one of many. The developers suggest a good money reward to anyone who will show a better alternative. If you believe it's just "one of many", why don't you send them a link to any other but better universal content syndicator for WordPress and just take your money? --Salvadorlee (talk) 09:30, 6 November 2020 (UTC) — Salvadorlee (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. comment struck - user blocked as a sock.[reply]

Comment - Being a better alternative than something else is a very, very long way from establishing notability. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:23, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Let me disagree with you. When we say "an ultimate assault riffle", we think about AK47. When we say "a modern handgun", we think about "Glock". When we say "image manipulation and compute graphics", we think about "Photoshop". When we say "an operating system for personal computers", we think about "Windows" etc. The same applies to CyberSEO. It's definitely not just a one of many. It's the one and only content syndication plugin for WordPress which supports all existing sources, such as RSS, Atom, XML of any structure, JSON of any structure, CSV and raw text dump of any structure and even HTML pages. If you know any other plugin with the same features, please tell us about it and please make a special article for it in Wikipedia. Andrewsix (talk) 18:02, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Curiously, I never think of guns and know nothing about them - we don't have them in Britain. Claiming notability because something does a thing that no others do, still needs reliable and independent sources. I can drink a cup of tea using my toes. I know of nobody else that can do that, but it still isn't notable, thankfully. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 18:30, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'll give you a hint which works for everything: for cars, for toasters, for chocolate and for software. If you want to compare something with something, just read the documentation. Please believe me, that works IRL. There are not many professional multi-functional content syndication plugins for WordPress. You will barely need fingers of your second hand to number them all. So it's not a big deal to compare the specs, described on their official sites. If you, like me, were using them for years, you may consider yourself an expert. Personally I've started using RSS and CSV content fetching solutions in early 2000's, because almost all serious affiliate programs provide these tools to the partners. Andrewsix (talk) 21:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:GNG to understand why that isn't relevant. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:24, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can I suggest you to read WP:OZD? Andrewsix (talk) 18:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 00:08, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm simply not seeing any sign of notability for this WordPress plugin. The 'Book Source' in the article is a how to use wordpress tutorial book, in which the plugin is mentioned alongside 3 other similar plugins and given some trivial coverage that essentially amounts to installation and setup instructions. Google turns up primary sources, social media and mentions in lists and the like. No news or newspaper hits. I was unable to find any significant coverage in google books. I've also not been able to find any sources under the plugin's previous name, CyberSyn. 192.76.8.81 (talk) 19:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.