Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyanide and happiness (webcomic)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:22, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cyanide and happiness (webcomic)[edit]

nn webcomic with 144 unique google hits. The article also is not POV. If we were to strip out the POV stuff, it would have no useful content. Wh e re ^(talk) 01:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable.--blue520 01:26, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete, no notability established. Royboy crashfan 01:27, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Given 287,000 hits total, the unique hits are a poor statistic; see Wikipedia:Search engine test for why. Of course, the article is pathetic and fails WP:WEB. Melchoir 02:04, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Or just one that calls for interpretation; that some of those hits reference requests for site voting is illustrative. (By the bye, has anyone actually looked at this disgusting, lame, stickfigure "comic?" A recommendation: don't.) RGTraynor 15:26, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless expanded, but without prejudice of someone writing a real article. Kotepho 02:24, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No assertion of notability in its current incarnation. --Hyperbole 04:44, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NN and WP:VAIN. Danny Lilithborne 08:35, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 20:36, 14 April 2006 (UTC) [reply]
Strong Delete, nn webcomic, completely unsalvagable.--Jersey Devil 02:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I just found an article on the same subject at Cyanide and Happiness. Since the same arguments for Cyanide and happiness (webcomic) apply, I have afd'd it, with the discussion directed here. If there is no additional discussion about this second article on this page by the time this AfD is scheduled to conclude, I request an extension. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 15:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.