Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curt Chiarelli (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Curt Chiarelli[edit]

Curt Chiarelli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This individual lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) It did not have any meaningful hits for news sources in a general search or video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no particularly relevant redirect targets, though I'd accept a redirect to his best-known work: Mortal Kombat. Please {{ping}} me if non-English or offline sources are found. – czar 07:24, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I find no reliable sources at all to this individual. The non- RS sources on the very poorly constructed article don't even verify the facts, so it appears WP:OR may also be a factor. Obviously I cannot see the article deleted in the prior AfD, but the discussion there seems to describe an article quite like the one at hand here. John from Idegon (talk) 08:39, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as there's too many possible redirects. Anarchyte 03:07, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unless sources can be found (I can't find any, but there may be some in specialist videogame magazinea). I can see the deleted 2005 article, which is on the same guy but doesn't have anything of use. – iridescent 22:48, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.