Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curiosity (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but I'm afraid the nominator is right about WP:NF. It could be argued that by being screened at a notable festival counts as "it's been taken note of" but the community disagrees. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Curiosity (film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short film with no evidence of notability; no awards, reviews etc. Tassedethe (talk) 01:39, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak delete~~ per WP:TOOSOON#Films. Current article lacks proper sourcing. Film has been included in a "Halloween Shorts Collection", and is itself now screening at festivals. Article will require use of available sources in its expansion. Film Monthly Cinema Crazed Fangoria FearNet Shock Til You Drop LA Short Fest etc. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Article is incomplete in many aspects but the subject is enough notable, featured in some international film festivals. Bill william compton (talk) 17:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I will not be intransigent. If you feel it can be improved, go for it! Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Glad will not be intransigent. Notable, as featured in international film festivals. - Ret.Prof (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Screening at a film festival is not a notability criteria as listed at WP:NF, except for criteria 2c The film was given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release. And this film does not match that criteria. Tassedethe (talk) 22:06, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.