Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cupcake party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was TRANSWIKI to Wikt. -Splash^talk 01:10, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cupcake party[edit]

Delete as non-notable party practice. Google search reveals this is not a common term. Hdstubbs 04:34, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete author of the article has vandalised before [1]. —This user has left wikipedia 10:02 2006-02-02
Transwiki to wiktionary, if they want it - Google search reveals several thousand hits, and if I've heard of it (on the other side of the planet), then chances are it's a reasonable well-known term. But it's unlikely that it'll ever be more than a dictdef. Grutness...wha? 11:10, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki. If Grutness has heard of it, I believe it exists, regardless of the author's history. Please discuss articles based on their merit and not that of their creator. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:08, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Google reveals a lot of hits but they are mostly not relevant. Mosly they are cupcake parties, merely parties involving cupcakes and not a specific now referring to this specific type of party. I mean it could go to Wiktionary but there really is no reason to do so. IMO Hdstubbs 19:42, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.