Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural superiority

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Ezeu 21:46, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural superiority[edit]

not encyclopedic Salvor Hardin 15:40, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I disagree Computerjoe 's talk 15:45, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki - notable, but looks more of a dicdef. --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 16:00, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Could be a dicdef, but as written it is more OR, bordering on POV. —ERcheck @ 16:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with Computerjoe's disagreement. I think this article, although worded a bit awkwardly, goes beyond (or, otherwise, can go beyond) a dicdef. -- Kicking222 16:08, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Culture. I think it's a valid topic, but right now it's not sufficiently substantive and relies on opinion. If it ever expands beyond a single paragraph, it can then be spun off onto its own page. :-) — RJH 16:39, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete or Merge - from the history section, nobody has cared about it in six months. If someone wanted to work with it and make it into a good, sourced article, that wouldn't be a bad thing, but as it is, it isn't worth keeping. BigDT 16:41, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete move it. Newyorktimescrossword 02:16, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, two sentences with no actual content. One link dead, another is someone's editorial, not a scientific source. Pavel Vozenilek 20:29, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.