Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cullen Chambers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SisterTwister sums up the issues at hand, and it's also worth noting that the article appears to have been written by the subject (whose only contributions were self-promotion). – Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:25, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cullen Chambers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established. No coverage in independent media, no significant featured roles. Wkharrisjr (talk) 14:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with no possible target for a redirect. Multiple Google News searches only provided the following links 1 (press release for his book) and 2 (brief mention of his book). Basically, he's another minor actor with the usual TV appearances. It even seems that his book is not notable and looking at one user generated review (I know, not reliable for Wikipedia but still relevant to the book), the book is more targeted toward extras new to the industry. Nothing to add or improve this article. SwisterTwister talk 21:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.