Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuda Wijeyeratne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:14, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cuda Wijeyeratne[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of significance Itsalleasy (talk) 02:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subject fails GNG and BIO. On a side note you might try using PROD before referring to AfD unless that's already been done. If worded strongly and citing the correct chapter and verses, I find PROD is effective about 70% of the time in getting rid of these kinds of promotional articles. I try to save AfD for the situations where the author wants to contest the deletion. -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:06, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While "no indication of significance"" is an inappropriate application of CSD criteria, and in any event inapt because the article does make claims of significance, the article subject fails WP:GNG and WP:PROF. There are references for a number of relatives, but WP:NOTINHERITED applies. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:16, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.